Friday, February 28, 2020

No More Warnings for Steve Outtrim



I wrote to Ms. Jacqueline Weaver after watching Steve Outtrim’s livestream which he claimed was a response to her article, “The Elliptical Universe of the Cryptobeast and the Grand Master of the Order of the One Star Monktel,” published on her Tracking the Leopard Meroz website.



In his livestream, Outtrim never, not once, mentions that Thomas Schoenberger is evading legal service. He alibis for Zach McQuaid, never acknowledging that McQuaid attempted to evade legal service himself, in imitation of his puppet master, and was only foiled because Canada is not California.



In email to Weaver, Schoenberger claims that Gabe Hoffman is "impersonating a lawyer," sending McQuaid fake lawsuits in an attempt to bully him. A fundamental error. Hoffman sued McQuaid for real. When McQuaid obeyed Schoenberger’s corrupt guidance to just ignore electronic service--the email delivery of court documents--he waltzed himself into a real mess, because his continued antisemitic smears against Hoffman put him in contempt of court, and worse, he used hate speech when he did it.

See: Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Statement of Claim, Gabriel Alan Hoffman and Zachary McQuaid, December 19, 2019. 


I am not aware that McQuaid has retained legal representation. I am not an enemy of McQuaid. In the final analysis, I may end up being his only friend, because I appear to be the only observer of these affairs repeatedly advising him to retain legal counsel. McQuaid is sued in meatspace. His own antisemitic smears made that happen. He had best respond in meatspace. He can certainly end up sanctioned in meatspace.



Outtrim asks why he should hire an attorney for McQuaid? There is a good reason why.



But I want to talk first about Outtrim’s lack of respect for legal processes and his bizarre interpretations. Antisemitism aside, this is at the heart of my rejection of Outtrim. He rejects the law because it is not Christian enough for him, he says, when that is just a synonym for doing things his way, not the way that our laws dictate.

These are excerpts from Steve Outtrim's comments to Jackie Weaver's article "Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid," Tracking the Leopard Meroz, February 7, 2020. 


Our laws doxxed McQuaid, he says, Weaver doxxed McQuaid, Hoffman doxxed McQuaid. Everyone doxxed McQuaid. I terrorize McQuaid. None of this is McQuaid’s fault. McQuaid is never blamed for making antisemitic smears. He is the victim. Outtrim could file a patent for weird leaps of logic. Indeed, Outtrim condemns me because I refuse to answer his questions, or provide “evidence” on his terms, which he gleefully declares makes me “ad hominem,” as Outtrim declares a monopoly for himself on all “evidence.”



It is an American tradition to sympathize with outlaws, we love our Bonnies and Clydes. I always wanted to be an Indian when playing Cowboys and Indians. But not in this case. These outlaws are antisemites. “Evidence?” Read the Statement of Claim. Outtrim can deny antisemitism, yet his own words and actions belie his denials, and it is this, I think, that is actually at the foundation of Outtrim’s support for Schoenberger and McQuaid. Antisemitism is the common denominator.



(Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Statement of Claim, Gabriel Alan Hoffman & Zachary McQuaid, Schedule "A," December 19, 2019, p. 7).



I wrote about this earlier, as Outtrim’s behavior makes no sense. A multimillionaire asking “why?” he should subsidize McQuaid’s legal defense, when he abuses McQuaid as an asymmetrical ideological weapon in his disputes with Weaver, Hoffman and I. Outtrim somehow feels entitled to abuse McQuaid, especially when it is Michael Levine paying for the antisemitic smears, not him.



(Esteban Trujillo de Gutierrez, "An Appeal to Steve Outtrim," Magic Kingdom Dispatch, February 24, 2020).  

Outtrim claims that his problem with Ms. Weaver is doxxing. He claims that Ms. Weaver doxxed McQuaid, when the Ontario Superior Court of Justice doxxed McQuaid. It was McQuaid’s antisemitic smears of a litigious financier that got him sued in the first place. McQuaid’s ongoing failure to retain a lawyer will expose his address all over again, as he is now in contempt of court. Hoffman will surely accuse him of hate speech, and more legal documents will surely be issued—and Jacqueline Weaver will perform a public service when she publishes them. Unredacted.

Outtrim’s sympathy for McQuaid is the true act of impersonation: he is really using McQuaid to cast doxxing shade on Weaver and on Hoffman, he tries to make this “Christians v. Satanists & Zionists,” and he desperately wants to implicate me in SRA, child molestation and worse at the Presidio in 1986. My refusal to regurgitate an alibi for him on command makes me guilty, and he claims that I am a “magician” who summons Enochian demons, because I research the Renaissance, Dr. John Dee, and admire Dame Frances Yates.



Does Outtrim cross the line to co-conspiracy and accessory to evading legal service through his willful blindness and diversions? It seems that Outtrim knows where the line of criminality stands, and he deftly avoids committing unambiguous crimes. But he flirts with the margins. There is no question that Outtrim is a partisan co-conspirator. 

I said before that evading legal service is a tactic. It can be used on a limited basis to gain time. When it is elevated to a strategy, the offender denies the legitimacy of our legal system, making it a shitty strategy, as it can only succeed for a finite period of time. Ultimately, the absconder will be served. 

Denying the legitimacy of our legal system is a losing strategy. Our legal systems are imperfect, and they are administered by humans, but we prefer them to street justice, though street justice would be infinitely more satisfying. Ask Mr. Valerin, who claims that I warred with the contras.



Finally, Outtrim proclaims “there is no warrant” out for Schoenberger’s arrest, like that matters. More diversion. We are dealing here with civil lawsuits, and these are no less vital than felonies for their protagonists. Indeed, they convert to felonies when contempt of court ensues, and I think that this may end up getting Schoenberger’s probation revoked, obstruction, remanding him back into custody. His clock is ticking.

Schoenberger is breaking the law, violating probation, cyberstalking and cyber bullying, calling Ms. Weaver and I “CIA assets,” in violation of Title 50, Protection of Identities. Ms. Weaver and I are not “CIA assets,” the proposition that she has a “Mockingbird” pedigree is ludicrous, and not all retired Green Berets work for CIA. But Schoenberger does not know that. He intends to expose us as intelligence officers. 




All that I can say is, Schoenberger is fortunate that I am not a CIA officer, because then he would quickly be a grease stain. Alas, I have to file complaints with federal agents just like any other citizen, which inconvenience Schoenberger will not be able to abuse for much longer.



I told Mr. Outtrim earlier to be careful with his associations, as he is mobbed up with felons committing ongoing felonies, and Mr. Hoffman has a track record of suing antisemites on contact. 

I no longer warn Mr. Outtrim. I want him to continue abusing Zack McQuaid as an ideological weapon. I want Mr. Outtrim to continue inferring that I am implicated in SRA, and worse. I want Outtrim to keep calling me an advocate of “left-hand path” practices, a “magician,” a “witch,” a “warlock,” and more. 


Keep talking, Mr. Outtrim.


Monday, February 24, 2020

An Appeal to Steve Outtrim

An Appeal to Steve Outtrim


I wrote the following as a response to the YouTube videographer known as Monkey Savant in a comment thread on my YouTube channel Samizdat YouTube.




Samizdat (Monkey Savant Mirror), "Monkey Savant Responds to Thomas's 2nd Doxxing Attempt Failure Feb 16, 2020," YouTube, February 23, 2020.


"Any dog is a far higher order of being than these conspiratorial nimrods. I much prefer the company of dogs and cats to that of humans, in any case. 

I am mystified by Outtrim. He is worth tens of millions of $AUS and yet he is in the gutter with a convicted felon stalker who absconds from legal service. It just makes no sense. 

(Steve Outtrim: Wikipedia, and his website, burners.me. The reference is to Thomas Schoenberger, whose criminal history is addressed in articles on my website Samizdat: see Cicada Files: Z 3301, et al, for example. Schoenberger is absconding from legal service, fleeing in effect, delaying justice by hiding. Outtrim is an egregious partisan endorsing Schoenberger's misconduct). 

Uh, no. I just had a conversation with an FBI Supervisory Special Agent and she confirmed that reporting felonies in progress cannot under any circumstances be mischaracterized as "gangstalking." In fact, I invite your "law enforcement" to contact me to address your claims of "aggravated stalking" and your threat to get me "charged in absentia." I look forward to hearing from them. 


Outtrim contorts himself to defend the indefensible, he is beyond partisan, and he straight up lies, calling me a "witch" and a "warlock," claiming that I "admit" to "sorcery," casting personal medical information that I shared with other combat veterans in the most negative possible light. He is shameless. 

(This refers to Outtrim's "gotchas" as he distorts statements made by me in various places and spins them to my detriment, again in comments, this time to an article by Jacqueline Weaver, "Gabe Hoffman vs. Zachary McQuaid aka Zack Quaid," Tracking the Leopard Meroz, February 7, 2020). 

And it makes no sense. 

The stupid is epic in this screenshot from an article on Outtrim's blog. He will never live this down. 


Outtrim is angry at me because I did him the favor of advising him that he is flirting with a lawsuit. I did not tell him that he is sued, because he is not yet sued. But I did say that he is liable to get sued, as he is implicated with his current confederates and involved in their inimical enterprises. 

First off, the link in the word "Bangkok" is to an article about an infamous sexpat neighborhood where someone opened a "museum" that claims that CIA officers hung out there. See what he did there? Next, I never self-described as a "researcher." That is Outtrim's word, he tags me with it, then he puts it in quotes, to mock me. His expression "statement of claim by a plaintiff to initiate a lawsuit" is how he refers to me advising him to watch his language with Gabe Hoffman, because Hoffman is litigious, capable and entirely willing to sue the shit out of scumbags like Outtrim who defame him, particularly in antisemitic terms. I do Outtrim a favor, but he considers it "lies."

And this is the truth. I did Outtrim a favor. I am not threatening him. I am advising him, and my advice is free, with no strings attached. 

Outtrim puts himself in a vulnerable position, and he gets mad at me for telling him so. He should consider that his legal position is shaky. If he steps just a little bit further and makes the wrong statements about the wrong person again, he is likely to find himself sued. 

I invite any law enforcement official investigating the death of Stone County Sheriff Sergeant Michael Stephen on July 19, 2019 to contact me. I have information for you. I have already referred this information to FBI. 


Outtrim can defame me all that he likes. I do not need to be liked or admired by him. I do not think that he can hurt my feelings, as I really do not care what he thinks about me. My reputation stands on its own merits, and I am pretty much impermeable to anything that anyone like him can do or say.

(I barely replied to Outtrim's smear on me on his blog, published as "A858 vs the Cat Ladies - Part 2 Spooky Steven and The Game," where "Spooky Steven" refers to me and he accuses me of sending him malware, consorting with notorious Satanist Michael Aquino, and writes "He claims to be a warlock/magician." 

These are not just lies, they are defamation, particularly when you understand that the terms "warlock" and "magician" in Outtrim's lexicon are Satanic, specifically in a context citing Michael Aquino. 

The malware was embedded by whomever sent him the email, my connection to it was no connection at all. Outtrim also claims that I commit the sin of linking to a person that I still never exchanged a word with (Glenn Herman of MAGACO) on KeyBase. 

Finally, Outtrim accuses me of being an "informant" for Gabe Hoffman. I sympathize with Mr. Hoffman, but I do not know him well enough for any court to consider him my associate, or even a friend. As for "informant?" I have zero tolerance for antisemitism. 

Finally, Outtrim illustrates his crushing personal ignorance by mischaracterizing Dr. John Dee's Monas Hieroglyphica as "Satanic," and he gets mad because I notice his antisemitism). 

Apparently Steve Outtrim considers tweets like this amusing. I do not get the joke. I am dear friends with an eminent artist whose father died in the Nazi prison camps, and I was privileged to serve with Israeli special operators. I have to wonder, in fact, whether this is an intentional dangle by Outtrim, as it strikes me as so egregious. But then--maybe he is just this stupid, and this antisemitic. 

I am not suing anybody, unless Outtrim gets so egregious that an enterprising Kiwi lawyer perceives that a defamation suit is a slam dunk and offers to take the case on contingency. 



I would collaborate with such a lawsuit and surrender all proceeds to charitably benefit New Zealand veterans of war. So if anyone knows a Kiwi lawyer who wants to make some easy money, send him my way. Outtrim already defamed me. It is easily proven. 

"Alongside?" You may come to regret that carefully chosen word, Mr. Outtrim. Maybe you were not quite careful enough. 


All that I ever did to Outtrim was give him advice and tell everyone to google his name to read articles in the Aussie press about his gross body odor and bad breath. I did not write those articles. I am sure that they are incorrect. Nobody can be that disgusting. But he made yet another bad decision, getting involved with a pathetic woman who whispered malign rumors about him to Aussie journalists. 



So, yes, I made some videos that mock Outtrim. I called him names. Especially after he tried to manipulate Ms. Denice Matteau, who never did anything to him. Another example of Outtrim getting mobbed up with scumbags, consorting with idiots. 


I do not think that Outtrim has defamed me to a terrible degree--yet. And I do not consider being called a "witch" an insult, in any case. I was born a Catholic and raised that way. Over years I learned my own blend of pantheism, and I found my own personal beliefs mirrored in Giordano Bruno and Shaivism. 



I only wrote an entire book about this. Revelation is free for download on Academia, ResearchGate, GoogleBooks, and elsewhere. Look to the left beneath my Welcome to this site. See all those links? Free book. You can buy it, as well, if you want to buy me a cup of coffee for writing it. 



I am trying to wake Steve Outtrim up. I am trying to help him. I should probably send him the rebuttal that I wrote about his article about me. He did commit to publish such rebuttals on his own site, after all. 

I cannot be held responsible for anyone googling "Steve Outtrim body odor." Be advised--laughter may ensue. 

Hmmm...."